[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UqUkKXvEJr5JPHgjNnY_1ALv7TiRY1UQjVGD4_su8M_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:21:40 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor: add csot
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:13 AM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye
> > <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add "csot" to the Devicetree Vendor Prefix Registry.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > > index 42d14899d584..375f1f7c79ef 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ patternProperties:
> > > description: Crystalfontz America, Inc.
> > > "^csky,.*":
> > > description: Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems Co., Ltd
> > > + "^csot,.*":
> > > + description: Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd
> >
> > Doing a `git log` on
> > `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml` shows that
> > most patches use the subject prefix `dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes`,
> > not `dt-bindings: vendor`. If device-tree folks care about this
> > difference and they don't want to fix it when applying, they might
> > request you to send a new version.
> >
> > In any case, that's fairly minor so I'm OK with:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> >
> > I would assume this will go through the DT tree, not drm-misc. If this
> > is wrong then someone should shout.
>
> idk, probably the whole series should go together via drm-misc.
> %subject can change if there's a resubmission, otherwise
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Ah, I'm fine landing it with drm-misc. I'll land it tomorrow unless
there are objections. I'll adjust the subject when landing.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists