[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250206044832.GA3614@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:48:32 -0800
From: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>,
Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hv_netvsc: Use VF's tso_max_size value when data
path is VF
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:43:19PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:21:55 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > Therefore, we use netif_set_tso_max_size() to set max segment size
>
> I think the term "segment" is used incorrectly throughout the patch ?
> Isn't the right term "superframe", "aggregate" or some such ?
Thanks Jakub, I think you are right. 'aggregate' or 'aggregated pkt'
would be a more accurate term. I'll have this incorporated in the next
version.
> --
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists