[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250206051557.27913-4-chen.dylane@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:15:56 +0800
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
qmo@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chen.dylane@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] libbpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API
Similarly to libbpf_probe_bpf_helper, the libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc
used to test the availability of the different eBPF kfuncs on the
current system.
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...il.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 18 +++++++++++-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 3020ee45303a..596b27f58c58 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1680,7 +1680,23 @@ LIBBPF_API int libbpf_probe_bpf_map_type(enum bpf_map_type map_type, const void
*/
LIBBPF_API int libbpf_probe_bpf_helper(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
enum bpf_func_id helper_id, const void *opts);
-
+/**
+ * @brief **libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc()** detects if host kernel supports the
+ * use of a given BPF kfunc from specified BPF program type.
+ * @param prog_type BPF program type used to check the support of BPF kfunc
+ * @param kfunc_id The btf ID of BPF kfunc to check support for
+ * @param btf_fd The module BTF FD, if kfunc is defined in kernel module,
+ * btf_fd is used to point to module's BTF, 0 means kfunc defined in vmlinux.
+ * @param opts reserved for future extensibility, should be NULL
+ * @return 1, if given combination of program type and kfunc is supported; 0,
+ * if the combination is not supported; negative error code if feature
+ * detection for provided input arguments failed or can't be performed
+ *
+ * Make sure the process has required set of CAP_* permissions (or runs as
+ * root) when performing feature checking.
+ */
+LIBBPF_API int libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
+ int kfunc_id, int btf_fd, const void *opts);
/**
* @brief **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()** is a helper function to get the
* number of possible CPUs that the host kernel supports and expects.
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index a8b2936a1646..e93fae101efd 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -436,4 +436,5 @@ LIBBPF_1.6.0 {
bpf_linker__add_buf;
bpf_linker__add_fd;
bpf_linker__new_fd;
+ libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc;
} LIBBPF_1.5.0;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
index e142130cb83c..c7f2b2dfbcf1 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
@@ -433,6 +433,61 @@ static bool can_probe_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
return true;
}
+int libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, int kfunc_id, int btf_fd,
+ const void *opts)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, btf_fd, kfunc_id),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ };
+ const size_t insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
+ char buf[4096];
+ int *fd_array = NULL;
+ size_t fd_array_cnt = 0, fd_array_cap = fd_array_cnt;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (opts)
+ return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
+
+ if (!can_probe_prog_type(prog_type))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (btf_fd) {
+ ret = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **)&fd_array, &fd_array_cap,
+ sizeof(int), fd_array_cnt + btf_fd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* In kernel, obtain the btf fd by means of the offset of
+ * the fd_array, and the offset is the btf fd.
+ */
+ fd_array[btf_fd] = btf_fd;
+ }
+
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ ret = probe_prog_load(prog_type, insns, insn_cnt, fd_array,
+ fd_array_cnt, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ free(fd_array);
+ return libbpf_err(ret);
+ }
+
+ free(fd_array);
+ /* If BPF verifier recognizes BPF kfunc but it's not supported for
+ * given BPF program type, it will emit "calling kernel function
+ * bpf_cpumask_create is not allowed", if the kfunc id is invalid,
+ * it will emit "kernel btf_id 4294967295 is not a function". If btf fd
+ * invalid in module btf, it will emit "invalid module BTF fd specified" or
+ * "negative offset disallowed for kernel module function call"
+ */
+ if (ret == 0 && (strstr(buf, "not allowed") || strstr(buf, "not a function") ||
+ (strstr(buf, "invalid module BTF fd")) ||
+ (strstr(buf, "negative offset disallowed"))))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1; /* assume supported */
+}
+
int libbpf_probe_bpf_helper(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, enum bpf_func_id helper_id,
const void *opts)
{
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists