[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bzch3zo3r77grfk4lywxdqkjlzfxaqrapdwcl4xgajnhh7nl6@jlr3eetu7lj7>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:42:49 +0530
From: Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SVM: Limit AVIC physical max index based on
configured max_vcpu_ids
Hi Vasant,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:18:29PM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
>
> On 2/3/2025 12:07 PM, Naveen N Rao (AMD) wrote:
<snip>
> > void avic_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > @@ -185,7 +202,8 @@ void avic_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> > if (kvm_svm->avic_logical_id_table_page)
> > __free_page(kvm_svm->avic_logical_id_table_page);
> > if (kvm_svm->avic_physical_id_table_page)
> > - __free_page(kvm_svm->avic_physical_id_table_page);
> > + __free_pages(kvm_svm->avic_physical_id_table_page,
> > + avic_get_physical_id_table_order(kvm));
>
> Move this hunk to previous patch (1/2) ?
>
> Rest looks good.
Sure, thanks for the review!
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists