[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250206-send-oss-20250129-v2-1-453755f58ae0@sony.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 14:59:59 +0530
From: Krishanth Jagaduri via B4 Relay <devnull+Krishanth.Jagaduri.sony.com@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Atsushi Ochiai <Atsushi.Ochiai@...y.com>,
Daniel Palmer <Daniel.Palmer@...y.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Krishanth Jagaduri <Krishanth.Jagaduri@...y.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation/no_hz: Remove description that states
boot CPU cannot be nohz_full
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
sched/isolation: Prevent boot crash when the boot CPU is nohz_full
[ Upstream commit 5097cbcb38e6e0d2627c9dde1985e91d2c9f880e ]
Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst states that the "nohz_full=" mask must not
include the boot CPU, which is no longer true after:
commit 08ae95f4fd3b ("nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be nohz_full").
However after:
aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work")
the kernel will crash at boot time in this case; housekeeping_any_cpu()
returns an invalid CPU number until smp_init() brings the first
housekeeping CPU up.
Change housekeeping_any_cpu() to check the result of cpumask_any_and() and
return smp_processor_id() in this case.
This is just the simple and backportable workaround which fixes the
symptom, but smp_processor_id() at boot time should be safe at least for
type == HK_TYPE_TIMER, this more or less matches the tick_do_timer_boot_cpu
logic.
There is no worry about cpu_down(); tick_nohz_cpu_down() will not allow to
offline tick_do_timer_cpu (the 1st online housekeeping CPU).
[ Apply only documentation changes as commit which causes boot
crash when boot CPU is nohz_full is not backported to stable
kernels - Krishanth ]
Fixes: aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work")
Reported-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411143905.GA19288@redhat.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240402105847.GA24832@redhat.com/
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Krishanth Jagaduri <Krishanth.Jagaduri@...y.com>
---
Hi,
Before kernel 6.9, Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst states that
"nohz_full=" mask must not include the boot CPU, which is no longer
true after commit 08ae95f4fd3b ("nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be
nohz_full").
When trying LTS kernels between 5.4 and 6.6, we noticed we could use
boot CPU as nohz_full but the information in the document was misleading.
This was fixed upstream by commit 5097cbcb38e6 ("sched/isolation: Prevent
boot crash when the boot CPU is nohz_full").
While it fixes the document description, it also fixes issue introduced
by another commit aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus'
timers on queue_delayed_work").
It is unlikely that upstream commit as a whole will be backported to
stable kernels which does not contain the commit that introduced the
issue of boot crash when boot CPU is nohz_full.
Could we fix only the document portion in stable kernels 5.4+ that
mentions boot CPU cannot be nohz_full?
---
Changes in v2:
- Add original changelog and trailers to commit message.
- Add backport note for why only document portion is modified.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205-send-oss-20250129-v1-1-d404921e6d7e@sony.com
---
Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst b/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst
index 065db217cb04fc252bbf6a05991296e7f1d3a4c5..16bda468423e88090c0dc467ca7a5c7f3fd2bf02 100644
--- a/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst
+++ b/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst
@@ -129,11 +129,8 @@ adaptive-tick CPUs: At least one non-adaptive-tick CPU must remain
online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system
calls like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs.
(This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no running
-user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.) Therefore, the
-boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks mode. Specifying a
-"nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will result in a boot-time
-error message, and the boot CPU will be removed from the mask. Note that
-this means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for
+user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.) Note that this
+means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y to do anything for you.
Finally, adaptive-ticks CPUs must have their RCU callbacks offloaded.
---
base-commit: 219d54332a09e8d8741c1e1982f5eae56099de85
change-id: 20250129-send-oss-20250129-3c42dcf463eb
Best regards,
--
Krishanth Jagaduri <Krishanth.Jagaduri@...y.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists