linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: Support ROHM BD79124 pinmux / GPO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a52933a2-8b87-4e49-a346-91266fe3b675@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:09:33 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
 Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
 Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
 Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: Support ROHM BD79124 pinmux / GPO

On 06/02/2025 11:39, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:40 PM Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 31/01/2025 15:38, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>>> The ROHM BD79124 is a 12-bit, 8-channel, SAR ADC. The AIN pins can be
>>> used as ADC inputs, or as general purpose outputs.
>>>
>>> Support changing pin function (GPO / ADC) and the gpo output control.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> NOTE: This patch is not properly tested. More thorough testing is to be
>>> done prior v2 if this pinmux approach makes sense.
>>
>> Just a note to reviewers - I dropped the pinmux from v2. No need to
>> review this any further.
> 
> Why? Gave up on the idea or want to pursue it later?

I just realized I should've shared the link to the v2 - which may not 
include all the recipients (because it no longer touches all the 
subsystems - and the get_maintainer.pl probably reduced the list of 
recipients). So, for anyone interested, here's the v2:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1738761899.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/

I do still appreciate all the reviews of the v2 even if it does not 
target subsystem you're specifically watching ;) But reviewing the RFC 
v1 patches does not make sense because the v2 dropped a few of them.

Yours,
	-- Matti