[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0aeefc5-bf01-42ab-91e4-e727d560c983@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:56:36 +0900
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, mkl@...gutronix.de,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, thomas.kopp@...rochip.com,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Remove repeated word in docs
On 06/02/2025 at 18:15, Charles Han wrote:
> Remove the repeated word "to" docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml | 2 +-
> Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
> index 2a98b26630cb..c155c9c6db39 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ properties:
>
> microchip,rx-int-gpios:
> description:
> - GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which
> + GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which
> signals a pending RX interrupt.
> maxItems: 1
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> index 12aa63840830..994f9e5638ee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> @@ -4521,7 +4521,7 @@ Both online and offline repair can use this strategy.
> | For this second effort, the ondisk parent pointer format as originally |
> | proposed was ``(parent_inum, parent_gen, dirent_pos) → (dirent_name)``. |
> | The format was changed during development to eliminate the requirement |
> -| of repair tools needing to to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field |
> +| of repair tools needing to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field |
This breaks the indentation of the pipe on the right.
> | always matched when reconstructing a directory. |
> | |
> | There were a few other ways to have solved that problem: |
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
Powered by blists - more mailing lists