linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1da6b6e3f9cd1abd84cc5d3d73a2ad3d1340914d.camel@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 13:57:14 +0000
From: Isaac Scott <isaac.scott@...asonboard.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: michael.hennerich@...log.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dheeraj.linuxdev@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER_DOWN bit
 number

On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 13:44 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:28:15PM +0000, Isaac Scott wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 12:58 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > You didn't include a Fixes tag or otherwise mention that this was
> > > a
> > > fix
> > > for a recent change so I was applying this as a fix for Linus'
> > > tree.
> 
> > To be clear, would you like me to resend the patch with the fixes
> > tag?
> 
> Yes, like the message said please resend.  Though isn't this the same
> as
> the fix that Dheeraj already sent:
> 

Yes, we have both fixed the same thing! Although I wasn't CC'd so I
didn't know they fixed my patch.

Best wishes,
Isaac
>   
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206103153.59114-1-dheeraj.linuxdev@gmail.com