[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6YbTgpbimhonft2@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:40:14 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kthread: Return the assigned value rather than 0
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 01:45:13AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Le Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> > > Recently introduced kthread_affine_preferred() has a bug that the value
> > > of ret variable set but not used. This breaks the compilation with error
> > > (assume default CONFIG_WERROR=y and `make W=1` to run the build):
> > >
> > > kernel/kthread.c:862:6: error: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4d13f4304fa4 ("kthread: Implement preferred affinity")
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks but I already have it queued there:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git/commit/?h=kthread/fixes&id=1b0332a42656b798bea867631d739de023633ec6
> >
> > I'll do a pull request shortly.
>
> I'm fine with any approach as long as the issue will be fixed rather sooner.
Any news? As of today no appearance of the (alternative) fix either in upstream,
or in Linux Next. What's the plan, please?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists