[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6YixPh_j517vqcP@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:12:04 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Free obsolete roots when pre-faulting SPTEs
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025, Yan Zhao wrote:
> Always free obsolete roots when pre-faulting SPTEs in case it's called
> after a root is invalidated (e.g., by memslot removal) but before any
> vcpu_enter_guest() processing of KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS.
>
> Lack of kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots() in this scenario can lead to
> kvm_mmu_reload() failing to load a new root if the current root hpa is an
> obsolete root (which is not INVALID_PAGE). Consequently,
> kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory() will retry infinitely due to the checking
> of is_page_fault_stale().
>
> It's safe to call kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots() even if there are no
> obsolete roots or if it's called a second time when vcpu_enter_guest()
> later processes KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS. This is because
> kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots() sets an obsolete root to INVALID_PAGE and
> will do nothing to an INVALID_PAGE.
Why is userspace changing memslots while prefaulting?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 47fd3712afe6..72f68458049a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4740,7 +4740,12 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> /*
> * reload is efficient when called repeatedly, so we can do it on
> * every iteration.
> + * Before reload, free obsolete roots in case the prefault is called
> + * after a root is invalidated (e.g., by memslot removal) but
> + * before any vcpu_enter_guest() processing of
> + * KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS.
> */
> + kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots(vcpu);
> r = kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu);
> if (r)
> return r;
I would prefer to do check for obsolete roots in kvm_mmu_reload() itself, but
keep the main kvm_check_request() so that the common case handles the resulting
TLB flush without having to loop back around in vcpu_enter_guest().
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index 050a0e229a4d..f2b36d32ef40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
static inline int kvm_mmu_reload(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS, vcpu))
+ kvm_mmu_free_obsolete_roots(vcpu);
+
/*
* Checking root.hpa is sufficient even when KVM has mirror root.
* We can have either:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists