[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c5f962b-3264-49c8-a1c5-893b8eb41b63@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:02:52 -0600
From: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <andreas@...nade.info>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
<rogerq@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <m-leonard@...com>, <praneeth@...com>,
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC GPIO Support
Hi,
On 2/7/2025 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>
>> This follow-up series is dependent on:
>> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
>> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
>> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>>
> Did these go into v6.14?
>
> Bart
These didn't. I figured with the dependency feedback, it was easier to combine the series for TPS65215 and TPS65214 into 1 series.
I submitted the combined mfd + dt-binding series [0] first, and once that was ACK'd, I will follow up with the gpio series for both devices.
Let me know if there's a different approach you would recommend!
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250206173725.386720-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists