linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/583] 6.12.13-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvs9GUK25mx-v+Fh-E55v2F=he8v=pSbPa_r4Zw51CNuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:06:27 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/583] 6.12.13-rc2 review

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 21:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.13 release.
> There are 583 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:05:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.13-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.12.13-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: c4de2ac60676d8cbaedb6e7a4b422c65b911f12e
* git describe: v6.12.11-627-gc4de2ac60676
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.11-627-gc4de2ac60676

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5)

## Test result summary
total: 1335, pass: 981, fail: 267, skip: 87, xfail: 0

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 113 total, 113 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 9 total, 8 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 20 total, 16 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* sparc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-rust
* libgpiod
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-tracing
* perf

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org