[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6ZHbmkCGRGRJC_U@rric.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:48:30 +0100
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] cxl/acpi: Unify CFMWS memory log messages with
SRAT messages
On 07.02.25 11:30:46, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:37:53PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> > CFMWS entries have a similar importance as SRAT table entries to
> > describe memory regions. For CXL error analysis and memory debugging
> > information of both is needed. Unify output of both messages to
> > improve logging. Change the style of CFMWS message according to SRAT
> > output. Also, turn messages into a dev_info() same as for SRAT.
> >
> > SRAT pr_info() for reference:
> >
> > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:
> > pr_info("SRAT: Node %u PXM %u [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]%s%s\n",
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Thanks for all your reviews.
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists