[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202502080425.N7HVOOJr-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 04:24:18 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
timestamp@...ts.linux.dev,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: don't build HTE code with CONFIG_HTE disabled
Hi Bartosz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on brgl/gpio/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.14-rc1 next-20250207]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bartosz-Golaszewski/gpiolib-don-t-build-HTE-code-with-CONFIG_HTE-disabled/20250207-163408
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207083146.17872-1-brgl%40bgdev.pl
patch subject: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: don't build HTE code with CONFIG_HTE disabled
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502080425.N7HVOOJr-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502080425.N7HVOOJr-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502080425.N7HVOOJr-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/power/supply/max8903_charger.c:9:
include/linux/gpio/consumer.h:557:3: error: call to undeclared function 'WARN_ON'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
557 | WARN_ON(desc);
| ^
>> include/linux/gpio/consumer.h:559:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ENOSYS'
559 | return -ENOSYS;
| ^
include/linux/gpio/consumer.h:565:3: error: call to undeclared function 'WARN_ON'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
565 | WARN_ON(desc);
| ^
include/linux/gpio/consumer.h:567:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ENOSYS'
567 | return -ENOSYS;
| ^
4 errors generated.
vim +/ENOSYS +559 include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
548
549 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE)
550 int gpiod_enable_hw_timestamp_ns(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned long flags);
551 int gpiod_disable_hw_timestamp_ns(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned long flags);
552 #else
553 static inline int gpiod_enable_hw_timestamp_ns(struct gpio_desc *desc,
554 unsigned long flags)
555 {
556 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB))
557 WARN_ON(desc);
558
> 559 return -ENOSYS;
560 }
561 static inline int gpiod_disable_hw_timestamp_ns(struct gpio_desc *desc,
562 unsigned long flags)
563 {
564 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB))
565 WARN_ON(desc);
566
567 return -ENOSYS;
568 }
569 #endif /* CONFIG_GPIOLIB && CONFIG_HTE */
570
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists