[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4541fab007858c599aed1d1e3e98883@paul-moore.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:42:57 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, Bram Bonné <brambonne@...gle.com>, Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>, Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for io_uring_setup()
On Jan 27, 2025 Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> It is desirable to allow LSM to configure accessibility to io_uring
> because it is a coarse yet very simple way to restrict access to it. So,
> add an LSM for io_uring_allowed() to guard access to io_uring.
>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 +
> include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +-
> security/security.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks Hamza, this looks good to me, but we need to wait until we get an
ACK from Jens on path 1/2; he's pretty responsive so I don't think we'll
have to wait too long.
As far as the return/label issue in patch 1/2, as long as there are no
other issues, and you are okay with the change, I can fix that up when
merging your patches.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists