[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6aMuuXMQAu7Tcvm@debug.ba.rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:44:10 -0800
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@....com, richard.henderson@...aro.org,
jim.shu@...ive.com, andybnac@...il.com, kito.cheng@...ive.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, atishp@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com,
cleger@...osinc.com, alexghiti@...osinc.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/26] mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check
shadow stack vma
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:27:10AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>On 2/5/25 02:21, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>> VM_SHADOW_STACK (alias to VM_HIGH_ARCH_5) is used to encode shadow stack
>
>I see that arm GCS uses VM_HIGH_ARCH_6.
Stale commit message. I thought I had fixed it.
Sorry about that, will fix it.
>
>> VMA on three architectures (x86 shadow stack, arm GCS and RISC-V shadow
>
>And RISC-V doesn't define it at all, not even in this patchset, or did I
>miss it somewhere?
>
>> stack). In case architecture doesn't implement shadow stack, it's VM_NONE
>> Introducing a helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to determine shadow stack vma
>> or not.
>
>This looks like an unfinished sentence. As if it was to continue with "...
>will allow us to ..." what?
>
>I'm not against a helper but this changelog is rather confusing and also
>code in arch/x86 and arch/arm64 isn't converted to the helper but testing
>VM_SHADOW_STACK still.
Yes I didn't pay attention during rebase, will update the commit message.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
>> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
>> mm/vma.h | 10 +++++++---
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>> index 3883b307780e..8c64f3ff34ab 100644
>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags)
>> !writable_file_mapping_allowed(vma, gup_flags))
>> return -EFAULT;
>>
>> - if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) {
>> + if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags)) {
>> if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> /*
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index cda01071c7b1..7b6be4eec35d 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(old_mmap, struct mmap_arg_struct __user *, arg)
>> */
>> static inline unsigned long stack_guard_placement(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
>> {
>> - if (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)
>> + if (is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags))
>> return PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/mm/vma.h b/mm/vma.h
>> index a2e8710b8c47..47482a25f5c3 100644
>> --- a/mm/vma.h
>> +++ b/mm/vma.h
>> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_prev_limit(struct vma_iterator *vmi,
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * These three helpers classifies VMAs for virtual memory accounting.
>> + * These four helpers classifies VMAs for virtual memory accounting.
>> */
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ static inline bool is_exec_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
>> return (flags & (VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_STACK)) == VM_EXEC;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
>> +{
>> + return !!(vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Stack area (including shadow stacks)
>> *
>> @@ -297,7 +302,7 @@ static inline bool is_exec_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
>> */
>> static inline bool is_stack_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
>> {
>> - return ((flags & VM_STACK) == VM_STACK) || (flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK);
>> + return ((flags & VM_STACK) == VM_STACK) || is_shadow_stack_vma(flags);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -308,7 +313,6 @@ static inline bool is_data_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
>> return (flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_SHARED | VM_STACK)) == VM_WRITE;
>> }
>>
>> -
>> static inline void vma_iter_config(struct vma_iterator *vmi,
>> unsigned long index, unsigned long last)
>> {
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists