[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67a692c4.a70a0220.387922.d940@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:09:54 -0800
From: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] rust: lockdep: Use Pin for all LockClassKey usages
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 12:22:19AM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On 06.02.25 22:27, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 08:30:50PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> >> On 05.02.25 20:59, Mitchell Levy wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> >>> index 41dcddac69e2..119e5f569bdb 100644
> >>> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> >>> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> >>> @@ -7,12 +7,9 @@
> >>>
> >>> use super::LockClassKey;
> >>> use crate::{
> >>> - init::PinInit,
> >>> - pin_init,
> >>> - str::CStr,
> >>> - types::{NotThreadSafe, Opaque, ScopeGuard},
> >>> + init::PinInit, pin_init, str::CStr, types::NotThreadSafe, types::Opaque, types::ScopeGuard,
> >>> };
> >>> -use core::{cell::UnsafeCell, marker::PhantomPinned};
> >>> +use core::{cell::UnsafeCell, marker::PhantomPinned, pin::Pin};
> >>> use macros::pin_data;
> >>>
> >>> pub mod mutex;
> >>> @@ -121,7 +118,7 @@ unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send, B: Backend> Sync for Lock<T, B> {}
> >>>
> >>> impl<T, B: Backend> Lock<T, B> {
> >>> /// Constructs a new lock initialiser.
> >>> - pub fn new(t: T, name: &'static CStr, key: &'static LockClassKey) -> impl PinInit<Self> {
> >>> + pub fn new(t: T, name: &'static CStr, key: Pin<&'static LockClassKey>) -> impl PinInit<Self> {
> >>
> >> Static references do not need `Pin`, since `Pin::static_ref` [1] exists,
> >> so you can just as well not add the `Pin` here and the other places
> >> where you have `Pin<&'static T>`.
> >>
> >
> > You're right about `Pin` not needed for 'static. However, the
> > `Pin<&'static LockClassKey>` signature is the intermediate state, and
> > eventually we will need to support initializing a lock (and others) with
> > a dynamically allocated `LockClassKey`, and when that is available, the
> > type of `key` will become `Pin<&'a LockClassKey>`, so `Pin` is needed.
> >
> > So I would like to keep this patch as it is. Works for you?
>
> Makes sense and fine by me. It would be nice if it was also mentioned in
> the commit message. Thanks!
This makes sense and is a good point. Will resend with a fixed commit
message.
Thanks,
Mitchell
> ---
> Cheers,
> Benno
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Boqun
> >
> >> The reasoning is that since the data lives for `'static` at that
> >> location, it will never move (since it is borrowed for `'static` after
> >> all).
> >>
> >> [1]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/pin/struct.Pin.html#method.static_ref
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Cheers,
> >> Benno
> >>
> >>> pin_init!(Self {
> >>> data: UnsafeCell::new(t),
> >>> _pin: PhantomPinned,
> >>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
> >>> index 480ee724e3cc..d65f94b5caf2 100644
> >>> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
> >>> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
> >>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >>> use core::{
> >>> cell::UnsafeCell,
> >>> marker::{PhantomData, PhantomPinned},
> >>> + pin::Pin,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /// Trait implemented for marker types for global locks.
> >>
> >>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists