lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250207034550.GC4596@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:45:50 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frank Crawford <frank@...wford.emu.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 29/33] hwmon: (it87) Check the it87_lock() return
 value

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:51:59PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>   -	it87_lock(data);
>> +	int err = it87_lock(data);
>
> I am not going to accept patches with inline variable declarations
> if the patch is fixing an earlier problem, sorry. This only results
> in unnecessary backport failures.

In fact the inline variable declarations should never be used in
"normal" code by Linux coding standards.  The only reason the
warning is disabled is for some of the magic scoping macros.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ