linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] cxl/pci: Map CXL PCIe Root Port and Downstream Switch Port RAS registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z6W2hFI7UsEslB3U@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:30:12 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, nifan.cxl@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
	alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, mahesh@...ux.ibm.com,
	ira.weiny@...el.com, oohall@...il.com, Benjamin.Cheatham@....com,
	rrichter@....com, nathan.fontenot@....com,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, lukas@...ner.de,
	ming.li@...omail.com, PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com,
	alucerop@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] cxl/pci: Map CXL PCIe Root Port and Downstream
 Switch Port RAS registers

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:38:44AM -0600, Terry Bowman wrote:
> +static bool dev_is_cxl_pci(struct device *dev, u32 pcie_type)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +
> +	if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	return (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == pcie_type);
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_init_ep_ports_aer(struct cxl_ep *ep)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_dport *dport = ep->dport;
> +
> +	if (dport) {
> +		struct device *dport_dev = dport->dport_dev;
> +
> +		if (dev_is_cxl_pci(dport_dev, PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) ||
> +		    dev_is_cxl_pci(dport_dev, PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT))

Mostly an observation - this kind of comparison seems to be coming up
more.  Wonder if an explicit set of APIs for these checks would be worth
it to clean up the 3 or 4 different comparison variants i've seen.

Either way

Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>

~Gregory