linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mf9WQjVXvea7tHx0MJG2H8Yqxw=zGqvjp7dfD7+=huDKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:49:41 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:48 PM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> This series was inspired by some minor annoyance I have experienced a
> few times in recent reviews.
>
> Calling gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() can be quite verbose due to
> having so many parameters. In most cases, we already have a struct
> gpio_descs that contains the first 3 parameters so we end up with 3 (or
> often even 6) pointer indirections at each call site. Also, people have
> a tendency to want to hard-code the first argument instead of using
> struct gpio_descs.ndescs, often without checking that ndescs >= the
> hard-coded value.
>
> So I'm proposing that we add a gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep()
> function that is a wrapper around gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep()
> that has struct gpio_descs as the first parameter to make it a bit
> easier to read the code and avoid the hard-coding temptation.
>
> I've just done gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() for now since there
> were over 10 callers of this one. There aren't as many callers of
> the get and atomic variants, but we can add those too if this seems
> like a useful thing to do.
>
> Maintainers, if you prefer to have this go through the gpio tree, please
> give your Acked-by:, otherwise I will resend what is left after the next
> kernel release.
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Renamed new function from gpiods_multi_set_value_cansleep() to
>   gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep()
> - Fixed typo in name of replaced function in all commit messages.
> - Picked up trailers.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250131-gpio-set-array-helper-v1-0-991c8ccb4d6e@baylibre.com
>
> ---
> David Lechner (13):
>       gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep()
>       auxdisplay: seg-led-gpio: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       bus: ts-nbus: validate ts,data-gpios array size
>       bus: ts-nbus: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       gpio: max3191x: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       iio: adc: ad7606: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       iio: amplifiers: hmc425a: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       iio: resolver: ad2s1210: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       mmc: pwrseq_simple: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       mux: gpio: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       net: mdio: mux-gpio: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       phy: mapphone-mdm6600: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>       ASoC: adau1701: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
>
>  drivers/auxdisplay/seg-led-gpio.c           |  3 +--
>  drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c                       | 10 ++++++----
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c                | 18 +++++++-----------
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c                    |  3 +--
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c                |  3 +--
>  drivers/iio/amplifiers/hmc425a.c            |  3 +--
>  drivers/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c             |  8 ++------
>  drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c            |  3 +--
>  drivers/mux/gpio.c                          |  4 +---
>  drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-gpio.c            |  3 +--
>  drivers/phy/motorola/phy-mapphone-mdm6600.c |  4 +---
>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h               |  7 +++++++
>  sound/soc/codecs/adau1701.c                 |  4 +---
>  13 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: df4b2bbff898227db0c14264ac7edd634e79f755
> change-id: 20250131-gpio-set-array-helper-bd4a328370d3
>
> Best regards,
> --
> David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
>

I can provide an immutable branch for the entire series for everyone
to pull or I can apply patch one, provide an immutable branch and
every subsystem can take their respective patches. What do you prefer?

Bartosz