[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d03581a9-495d-47df-99f2-96065b06ee8f@rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:13:56 +0100
From: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, weilin.wang@...el.com
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/21] RISC-V: Add Ssccfg ISA extension definition and
parsing
On 06/02/2025 08:23, Atish Patra wrote:
> Ssccfg (‘Ss’ for Privileged architecture and Supervisor-level
> extension, ‘ccfg’ for Counter Configuration) provides access to
> delegated counters and new supervisor-level state.
>
> This patch just enables the definitions and enable parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index b4eddcb57842..fa5e01bcb990 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCSRIND 94
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCSRIND 95
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCNTRPMF 96
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCCFG 97
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCDELEG 98
>
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 8f225c9c3055..3cb208d4913e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -390,12 +390,14 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(zvksg, riscv_zvksg_bundled_exts),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zvkt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZVKT),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smcdeleg, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCDELEG),
Hi Atish,
based on your dt-binding commit, if smcdeleg depends on Sscsrind, Zihpm,
Zicntr, then you could add a validation callback here:
static int riscv_smcdeleg_validate(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data
*data, const unsigned long *isa_bitmap)
{
if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCSRIND) &&
__riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM) &&
__riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR))
return 0;
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
}
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(smcdeleg, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCDELEG,
riscv_smcdeleg_validate),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smcntrpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCNTRPMF),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smcsrind, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMCSRIND),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smmpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMMPM),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(smnpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMNPM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smstateen, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMSTATEEN),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssccfg, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCCFG),
Ditto for this one with Smcdeleg, Sscsrind, Zihpm, Zicntr, Sscofpmf,
Smcntrpmf.
Thanks,
Clément
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscsrind, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCSRIND),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(ssnpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSNPM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists