[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1a59a9b-2fc1-426e-99e0-26380fcbb4de@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:10:51 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>,
Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify
switches
Hi Hongbo,
On 2025/2/7 16:57, Hongbo Li via Linux-erofs wrote:
>
...
>>> @@ -329,35 +328,31 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>>> DBG_BUGON(lcn == initial_lcn &&
>>> m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD);
>>> - switch (m->type) {
>>> - case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
>>> - case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
>>> - case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
>>> + if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>> + erofs_err(sb, "cannot found CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
>>> + DBG_BUGON(1);
>>> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>> + }
>>
>> No, I don't think it's equivalent, please use
>> the previous version for this part instead.
>
> I think this version doesn't consider the fallthrough case. May be just use the goto statement can keep equivalent.
For this particular part, I tend to use the first
version since it's already simple enough anyway.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Thanks,
> Hongbo
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists