[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6543c6b6-da86-4c10-9b8c-e5fe6f6f7da9@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:27:10 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@....com, richard.henderson@...aro.org, jim.shu@...ive.com,
andybnac@...il.com, kito.cheng@...ive.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
atishp@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/26] mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow
stack vma
On 2/5/25 02:21, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> VM_SHADOW_STACK (alias to VM_HIGH_ARCH_5) is used to encode shadow stack
I see that arm GCS uses VM_HIGH_ARCH_6.
> VMA on three architectures (x86 shadow stack, arm GCS and RISC-V shadow
And RISC-V doesn't define it at all, not even in this patchset, or did I
miss it somewhere?
> stack). In case architecture doesn't implement shadow stack, it's VM_NONE
> Introducing a helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to determine shadow stack vma
> or not.
This looks like an unfinished sentence. As if it was to continue with "...
will allow us to ..." what?
I'm not against a helper but this changelog is rather confusing and also
code in arch/x86 and arch/arm64 isn't converted to the helper but testing
VM_SHADOW_STACK still.
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
> mm/vma.h | 10 +++++++---
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 3883b307780e..8c64f3ff34ab 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags)
> !writable_file_mapping_allowed(vma, gup_flags))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) {
> + if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags)) {
> if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE))
> return -EFAULT;
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index cda01071c7b1..7b6be4eec35d 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(old_mmap, struct mmap_arg_struct __user *, arg)
> */
> static inline unsigned long stack_guard_placement(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
> {
> - if (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)
> + if (is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags))
> return PAGE_SIZE;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/vma.h b/mm/vma.h
> index a2e8710b8c47..47482a25f5c3 100644
> --- a/mm/vma.h
> +++ b/mm/vma.h
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_prev_limit(struct vma_iterator *vmi,
> }
>
> /*
> - * These three helpers classifies VMAs for virtual memory accounting.
> + * These four helpers classifies VMAs for virtual memory accounting.
> */
>
> /*
> @@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ static inline bool is_exec_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
> return (flags & (VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_STACK)) == VM_EXEC;
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_shadow_stack_vma(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
> +{
> + return !!(vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Stack area (including shadow stacks)
> *
> @@ -297,7 +302,7 @@ static inline bool is_exec_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
> */
> static inline bool is_stack_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
> {
> - return ((flags & VM_STACK) == VM_STACK) || (flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK);
> + return ((flags & VM_STACK) == VM_STACK) || is_shadow_stack_vma(flags);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -308,7 +313,6 @@ static inline bool is_data_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
> return (flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_SHARED | VM_STACK)) == VM_WRITE;
> }
>
> -
> static inline void vma_iter_config(struct vma_iterator *vmi,
> unsigned long index, unsigned long last)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists