linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] objtool: Add option to fail build on vmlinux warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i-1C0eNAMvRtZTZ8yNT2TwC1tgLqP=9T=t38eWdaznFoS+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:16:04 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, 
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] objtool: Add option to fail build on vmlinux warnings

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 03:51, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
> I didn't quite follow the OBJTOOL_FLAGS idea.  We already have
> OBJTOOL_ARGS which allows adding arguments (though not removing them),
> was it mean to be something like that?

Oh. Yeah, exactly that. Nothing to do on this point then.