linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 06/14] rust: Add bare minimal bindings for clk framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250207104311.g2lexa75o26z6aox@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:13:11 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
	Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 06/14] rust: Add bare minimal bindings for clk
 framework

On 07-02-25, 14:54, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-02-25, 00:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> 
> So it should be this now ?

Also, I should be using ARef and AlwaysRefCounted along with that ? I
am not sure if I can use those with the clk API. Yes, it is refcounted
but there is no direct way of incrementing the refcount unlike other
frameworks. clk_get() accepts a dev pointer and a char pointer,
whereas clk_put() accepts the clk pointer itself.

-- 
viresh