[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250207122546.068435759@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 13:15:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com,
scott.d.constable@...el.com,
joao@...rdrivepizza.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
jpoimboe@...nel.org,
jose.marchesi@...cle.com,
hjl.tools@...il.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com,
nathan@...nel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org,
kees@...nel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] objtool: Move dodgy linker warn to verbose
The lld.ld borkage is fixed in the latest llvm release (?) but will
not be backported, meaning we're stuck with broken linker for a fair
while.
Lets not spam all clang build logs and move warning to verbose.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -2264,7 +2264,7 @@ static int read_annotate(struct objtool_
if (sec->sh.sh_entsize != 8) {
static bool warned = false;
- if (!warned) {
+ if (!warned && opts.verbose) {
WARN("%s: dodgy linker, sh_entsize != 8", sec->name);
warned = true;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists