linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] rust: io: mem: add a generic iomem abstraction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <774D098D-9FEC-45CC-8645-A6E5A7BEB4DF@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:25:08 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: 崔光博 <2407018371@...com>,
 Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
 Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
 a.hindborg@...nel.org,
 alex.gaynor@...il.com,
 benno.lossin@...ton.me,
 bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.mco,
 boqun.feng@...il.com,
 boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
 gary@...yguo.net,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 ojeda@...nel.org,
 rafael@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org,
 rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 tmgross@...ch.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] rust: io: mem: add a generic iomem abstraction

Sorry, didn’t find time to reply yesterday,


> 
> That's two different things here. Miguel questions whether the comment is
> correct. And I think it's not, they are indeed exposed.
> 

Yes, I said “not exposed”, but in truth I meant “you can’t use it”, as shown by
the build_error being triggered.

My bad. I will fix the wording so that it’s clear in the next iteration.

— Daniel