[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6eJeo34N0q2ldQ9@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 17:42:34 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Kevin Xie <kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: core: Synchronize runtime PM status of
parents and children
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 01:10:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:50:29PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > > Ok, so the driver data is never set and runtime PM is never enabled for
> > > > > > this simple bus device, which uses pm_runtime_force_suspend() for system
> > > > > > sleep.
> For now, the power.set_active propagation can be restricted to the
> parent of the device with DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set that needs to be
> resumed and that will just be sufficient ATM, so attached is a patch
> doing this.
I can confirm that this fixes the simple-pm-bus regression (without
reintroducing the pci warning) in case you want to get this to Linus
for rc2:
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists