[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whyBwei9inP2j1CYxH=RVoFya47rd2Z5oYfKNDKAz2Hxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:34:56 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] VFS: Ensure no async updates happening in directory
being removed.
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 14:30, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I've never used clang-format, but I do know it supports those kinds of
> extensions, since I see them in the kernel config file.
Bah. Over-eager editing removed the context of that sentence.
The context was supposed to be that in the kernel, we tend to have
lots of patterns that make traditional indentation checking totally
useless: things like the "list_for_each()" macro that obviously
includes a loop in it and thus has indentation expectations.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists