[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5857103.DvuYhMxLoT@lucaweiss.eu>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 15:16:17 +0100
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: core: do not silently ignore provided init_data
On dinsdag 8 oktober 2024 18:07:01 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On DT platforms, if a regulator init_data is provided in config, it is
> silently ignored in favor of the DT parsing done by the framework, if
> of_match is set.
>
> of_match is an indication that init_data is expected to be set based on DT
> and the parsing should be done by the regulator framework.
>
> If the regulator provider passed init_data it must be because it is useful
> somehow, in such case of_match should be clear.
>
> If the driver expects the framework to initialize this data on its
> own, it should leave init_data clear.
>
> Warn if both init_data and of_match are set, then default to the provided
> init_data.
Hi Jerome,
This commit is breaking USB on qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead for me.
I can't easily provide the full log since USB is breaking with this but in
effect it looks like in drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c in ci_get_platdata()
the call devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vbus"); is always returning
EPROBE_DEFER, so USB never initializes.
This vbus regulator is provided by ti,bq24192 so the bq24190_charger.c
driver. While the driver does seem to probe correctly, I do also see that
warning "Using provided init data - OF match ignored" in dmesg.
Reverting this patch on top of v6.13.2 fixes the issue and makes USB work
again.
Regards
Luca
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index d0b3879f2746..a58a9db3d9c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -5681,32 +5681,43 @@ regulator_register(struct device *dev,
> goto clean;
> }
>
> - init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc, config,
> - &rdev->dev.of_node);
> -
> - /*
> - * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to take
> - * that into account. This happens most the time if the ena_gpiod comes
> - * from a gpio extender or something else.
> - */
> - if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - goto clean;
> - }
> + if (config->init_data) {
> + /*
> + * Providing of_match means the framework is expected to parse
> + * DT to get the init_data. This would conflict with provided
> + * init_data, if set. Warn if it happens.
> + */
> + if (regulator_desc->of_match)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Using provided init data - OF match ignored\n");
>
> - /*
> - * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
> - * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
> - * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain
> - * a descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain
> - * a descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
> - * tree.
> - */
> - if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
> - dangling_of_gpiod = true;
> - if (!init_data) {
> init_data = config->init_data;
> rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
> +
> + } else {
> + init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc,
> + config,
> + &rdev->dev.of_node);
> +
> + /*
> + * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to
> + * take that into account. This happens most the time if the
> + * ena_gpiod comes from a gpio extender or something else.
> + */
> + if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto clean;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
> + * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
> + * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain a
> + * descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain a
> + * descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
> + * tree.
> + */
> + if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
> + dangling_of_gpiod = true;
> }
>
> ww_mutex_init(&rdev->mutex, ®ulator_ww_class);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists