linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250210104746.49eb1dd8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:47:46 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Brendan Higgins
 <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, "open list:KERNEL
 SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, KUnit Development
 <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames

Hi all,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 04:43:28 +0530 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2025, 2:44 AM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:53:43AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:  
> > > On 10/11/24 01:25, David Gow wrote:  
> > > > As discussed in [1], the KUnit test naming scheme has changed to avoid
> > > > name conflicts (and tab-completion woes) with the files being tested.
> > > > These renames and moves have caused a nasty set of merge conflicts, so
> > > > this series collates and rebases them all to be applied via
> > > > mm-nonmm-unstable alongside any lib/ changes[2].
> >
> > Shall I carry this in the hardening tree? I didn't see it land in the
> > merge window, and I still don't see it in -next?
> >  
> 
> My thinking was that this series would go through Andrew's tree to avoid
> conflicts. Please take it through yours.

If they have been rebased onto mm-nonmm-unstable, then they really need
to go through Andrew' tree (since mm-nonmm-unstable gets rebased often).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped