linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: i3c: Add Qualcomm I3C master controller bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93cc3419-bd01-4725-9ce9-40a99075a105@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:41:56 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: i3c: Add Qualcomm I3C master
 controller bindings



On 2/9/2025 5:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/02/2025 13:03, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>> I will remove minItems and MaxItems, will list Items with description.
>>>>
>> Wanted to check if below way is fine ? Because some of the ask to drop
>> constraints are already present in other i3c yaml files.
>>
>> if not, could you please help share example removing constraints and
>> listing item ?
>>
>> == Sample ==
>> properties:
>>     compatible:
>>       enum:
>>         - qcom,i3c-controller
>>
>>     reg:
>>       type: array
>>       minItems: 1
>>       maxItems: 1
>>       items:
>>         type: integer
>>       description: Base address and size of the I3C controller registers.
> 
> 
> I really do not understand this sample. That's not a DT schema code.
> Please open existing Qcom bindings and look how it is done.
> 
Added changes looking at existing i2c and i3c dt-bindings. Please help 
review latest.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof