[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173920411592.476427.15574016492470186426.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:22:38 -0600
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
arnd@...db.de, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: exynos: gs101: add ACPM related nodes
On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 15:56:42 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> Define SRAM, mailbox and ACPM protocol in device tree.
> Enable the mailbox and ACPM protocol in defconfig.
>
> Bindings for google,gs101-acpm-ipc are proposed at:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20250207-gs101-acpm-v7-0-ffd7b2fb15ae@linaro.org/T/#mb557ee342de628b1a8e462d4fb7c3ac6eb8be4e4
>
> Changes in v4:
> - rebase on top of v6.14-rc1.
> - describe in the cover letter where are the ACPM bindings.
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241220-gs101-acpm-dt-v3-0-642d64daa5d1@linaro.org
>
> Changes in v3:
> - ACPM: don't specify the channel ID and type in DT: the channel ID is
> discovered at runtime and the channel type is always DOORBELL for the
> ACPM interface.
> - mbox: update #mbox-cells = <0>;
> - rebase on top of v6.13-rc3
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212-b4-acpm-v4-upstream-dts-v2-0-91b7a6f6d0b0@linaro.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - update nodes based on the bindings updates
> - update mailbox and power-management (mailbox client) nodes to specify
> channel type (doorbell or data) and channel ID.
>
> v1:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241205180200.203146-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> ---
> Tudor Ambarus (4):
> arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add SRAM node
> arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add AP to APM mailbox node
> arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add ACPM protocol node
> arm64: defconfig: enable ACPM protocol and Exynos mailbox
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> ---
> base-commit: 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
> change-id: 20241220-gs101-acpm-dt-6dcde166530a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>
>
>
My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.
Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.
If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/' for 20250207-gs101-acpm-dt-v4-0-230ba8663a2d@...aro.org:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101-oriole.dtb: /firmware/power-management: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['google,gs101-acpm-ipc']
Powered by blists - more mailing lists