[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210173358.GI1868108@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:33:58 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
Cc: lkundrak@...sk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zijie98@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: ene-kb3930: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, Chenyuan Yang wrote:
> The off_gpios could be NULL. Add missing check in the kb3930_probe().
> This is similar to the issue fixed in commit
> b1ba8bcb2d1ffce11b308ce166c9cc28d989e3b9 ("backlight: hx8357:Fix potential NULL pointer dereference").
>
> Fixes: ede6b2d1dfc0 ("mfd: ene-kb3930: Add driver for ENE KB3930 Embedded Controller")
> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/ene-kb3930.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ene-kb3930.c b/drivers/mfd/ene-kb3930.c
> index fa0ad2f14a39..60824d847bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ene-kb3930.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ene-kb3930.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ static int kb3930_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> devm_gpiod_get_array_optional(dev, "off", GPIOD_IN);
> if (IS_ERR(ddata->off_gpios))
> return PTR_ERR(ddata->off_gpios);
> + if (!ddata->off_gpios)
> + return -ENOMEM;
I don't see many other call sites checking for NULL - why is this
different?
What about IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead?
> if (ddata->off_gpios->ndescs < 2) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid off-gpios property\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists