linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: cs35l41: Fix acpi_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <173921209231.185908.9967906389532316081.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:28:12 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: cs35l41: Fix acpi_device_hid() not found

On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:32:50 +0000, Stefan Binding wrote:
> Function acpi_device_hid() is only defined if CONFIG_ACPI is set.
> Use #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI to ensure that cs35l41 driver only calls this
> function is CONFIG_ACPI is define.
> 
> Fixes: 1d44a30ae3f9 ("ASoC: cs35l41: Fallback to using HID for system_name if no SUB is available")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502090100.SbXmGFqs-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs35l41: Fix acpi_device_hid() not found
      commit: b19181638182d1f5c43757b471c056b6196c8ca3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark