lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6pNBxgMKHTiHAnv@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:01:27 +0000
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v6] add ioctl/sysfs to donate file-backed pages

On 02/10, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 05:00:47PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/04, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On 01/17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 01/17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 06:48:55PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > I don't understand how this is different from MADV_COLD.  Please
> > > > > > > explain.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > MADV_COLD is a vma range, while this is a file range. So, it's more close to
> > > > > > fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) which tries to reclaim the file-backed pages
> > > > > > at the time when it's called. The idea is to keep the hints only, and try to
> > > > > > reclaim all later when admin expects system memory pressure soon.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So you're saying you want POSIX_FADV_COLD?
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, the intention looks similar like marking it cold and paging out later.
> > > 
> > > Kindly ping, for the feedback on the direction. If there's demand for something
> > > generalized api, I'm happy to explore.
> > 
> > If there's no objection, let me push the change in f2fs and keep an eye on
> > who more will need this in general.
> 
> I don't know why you're asking for direction.  I gave my direction: use
> fadvise().

Funny, that single question didn't mean like this at all. Will take a look
how the patch looks like.

> 
> Putting this directly in f2fs is a horrible idea.  NAK.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ