lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210195658.GK32480@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:56:59 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mitchell.augustin@...onical.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Batch BAR sizing operations

On 02/10, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void pci_read_bases(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int howmany, int rom)
>  	unsigned int pos, reg;
>  	u16 orig_cmd;
>  
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(howmany))
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);

Or just

	BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(howmany) && howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);

I dunno... Works for me in any case.

I don't know if this is "right" solution though, but I can't suggest
anything better.

Oleg.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ