[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210134848.78a1ab4a.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:48:48 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mitchell.augustin@...onical.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Batch BAR sizing operations
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:08:19 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 02/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 02/10, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void pci_read_bases(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int howmany, int rom)
> > > unsigned int pos, reg;
> > > u16 orig_cmd;
> > >
> > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);
> > > + if (__builtin_constant_p(howmany))
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);
> >
> > Or just
> >
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(howmany) && howmany > PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);
> >
> > I dunno... Works for me in any case.
> >
> > I don't know if this is "right" solution though,
>
> I mean, atm I simply don't know if with the newer compiler
> __builtin_constant_p(howmany) will be true in this case.
That I can confirm. With gcc 14.2.1, if I change the call in
pci_setup_device() to use 7 rather than 6 for howmany, the build fails.
If you confirm this resolves the build on older gcc, it seems like a
valid fix. I installed a VM with Fedora 23, which uses gcc 3.5.1, but
I haven't yet been able to successfully build any kernel with it. I'll
post a patch if you want to provide a Tested-by. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists