linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] sched: Reduce the default slice to avoid tasks getting an extra tick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250210062657.301669-1-15645113830zzh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:26:59 +0800
From: zihan zhou <15645113830zzh@...il.com>
To: vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: 15645113830zzh@...il.com,
	bsegall@...gle.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mgorman@...e.de,
	mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] sched: Reduce the default slice to avoid tasks getting an extra tick


> > Update sysctl_sched_base_slice with debugfs, limit its value and
> > update normalized_sysctl_sched_base_slice.
> >
> > Rename the function sched_update_scaling to sched_update_scaling_or_slice,
> > it is no longer related to CONFIG_SMP and return void, as the previous
> > function always returns 0 and there is no need to judge the return value
> > again, just like the function update_sysctl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: zihan zhou <15645113830zzh@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> 
> My Reviewed applied only for patch 1 not patch 2. That's also why I
> asked you to split it. Patch 1 makes sense for me but I don't see the
> benefit of patch 2

I'm sorry I misunderstood your meaning. Do I need to resubmit or just
ignore this patch?