[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210082907.4059064-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:26:02 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [rfc, PATCH v1 1/1] hrtimers: Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation
Clang complains about overlapped initialisers in the
hrtimer_clock_to_base_table definition. With `make W=1` and
CONFIG_WERROR=y (which is default nowadays) this breaks
the build:
CC kernel/time/hrtimer.o
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:21: error: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Werror,-Winitializer-overrides]
124 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:27: note: previous initialization is here
122 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
(and similar for CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, and CLOCK_TAI).
Refactor hrtimer_clock_to_base_table initialisation to make
the compiler happy.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
TBH, I don't like much this solution as it diminishes the point of that
override to be there in the first place. I haven't found better alternatives
as they may be too intrusive. Another one might be to remove this table,
but in such case the replacement might add latency to some cases (although
I haven't checked the generated code for, for example, switch-case approach).
In any case this is an rfc, I would be glad if somebody fixes this in a better
way.
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index deb1aa32814e..8ec6ff36b9ad 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -118,13 +118,21 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases) =
};
static const int hrtimer_clock_to_base_table[MAX_CLOCKS] = {
- /* Make sure we catch unsupported clockids */
- [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC,
+ [CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME,
+ [CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_SGI_CYCLE] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
+ [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI,
- [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME,
- [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC,
- [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME,
- [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI,
+ /* Make sure we catch unsupported clockids */
+ [CLOCK_TAI + 1 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES,
};
static inline bool hrtimer_base_is_online(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
--
2.45.1.3035.g276e886db78b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists