lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6nKpQTWqh59/zY8@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:15:09 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@....com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modify the min_perf
 calculation in adjust_perf callback

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:25:14AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Instead of setting a fixed floor at lowest_nonlinear_perf, use the
> min_limit_perf value, so that it gives the user the freedom to lower the
> floor further.
> 
> There are two minimum frequency/perf limits that we need to consider in
> the adjust_perf callback. One provided by schedutil i.e. the sg_cpu->bw_min
> value passed in _min_perf arg, another is the effective value of
> min_freq_qos request that is updated in cpudata->min_limit_perf. Modify the
> code to use the bigger of these two values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@....com>

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 9dc3933bc326..a23fb78a442b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>  				   unsigned long capacity)
>  {
>  	unsigned long max_perf, min_perf, des_perf,
> -		      cap_perf, lowest_nonlinear_perf;
> +		      cap_perf, min_limit_perf;
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>  	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>  
> @@ -684,20 +684,20 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>  	if (policy->min != cpudata->min_limit_freq || policy->max != cpudata->max_limit_freq)
>  		amd_pstate_update_min_max_limit(policy);
>  
> -
>  	cap_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
> -	lowest_nonlinear_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf);
> +	min_limit_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->min_limit_perf);
>  
>  	des_perf = cap_perf;
>  	if (target_perf < capacity)
>  		des_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * target_perf, capacity);
>  
> -	min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf);
>  	if (_min_perf < capacity)
>  		min_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * _min_perf, capacity);
> +	else
> +		min_perf = cap_perf;
>  
> -	if (min_perf < lowest_nonlinear_perf)
> -		min_perf = lowest_nonlinear_perf;
> +	if (min_perf < min_limit_perf)
> +		min_perf = min_limit_perf;
>  
>  	max_perf = cpudata->max_limit_perf;
>  	if (max_perf < min_perf)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ