[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2985987.1739185070@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:57:50 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "Marc Dionne" <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
"Steve French" <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...nel.org>,
"Latchesar
Ionkov" <lucho@...kov.net>,
"Dominique Martinet" <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
"Christian Schoenebeck" <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
"Paulo Alcantara" <pc@...guebit.com>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Add retry stat counters
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev> wrote:
> I recommend trying to reproduce with steps I shared in my initial report:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/a7x33d4dnMdGTtRivptq6S1i8btK70SNBP2XyX_xwDAhLvgQoPox6FVBOkifq4eBinfFfbZlIkMZBe3QarlWTxoEtHZwJCZbNKtaqrR7PvI=@pm.me/
>
> I know it may not be very convenient due to all the CI stuff,
That's an understatement. :-)
> but you should be able to use it to iterate on the kernel source locally and
> narrow down the problem.
Can you share just the reproducer without all the docker stuff? Is this one
of those tests that requires 9p over virtio? I have a different environment
for that.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists