[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <764b2869-8023-45b2-bae9-5a24be1ea519@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:25:07 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PM: EM: Drop unused parameter from
em_adjust_new_capacity()
On 1/27/25 13:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The max_cap parameter is never used in em_adjust_new_capacity(), so
> drop it.
>
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -728,8 +728,7 @@
> * are correctly calculated.
> */
> static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
> - struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> - u64 max_cap)
> + struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> {
> struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
>
> @@ -800,7 +799,7 @@
> cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
>
> dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> - em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd, cpu_capacity);
> + em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
> }
>
> free_cpumask_var(cpu_done_mask);
>
>
>
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists