lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ycd7uds73swh2ql42455ifv6fmdpa5sklmldgdfk5y2b5is6jk@etmnysxnenn7>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:42:16 -0500
From: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@...ancedwards.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, 
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Fix uninitialized variable

On 25/02/10 05:41AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Ethan Carter Edwards wrote:
> > There is a possibility for an uninitialized *ret* variable to be
> > returned in some code paths.
> > 
> > Fix this by initializing *ret* to 0.
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1642546 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> > Fixes: 774bcfb731765d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for virtual planes")
> > Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@...ancedwards.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > index 098abc2c0003cde90ce6219c97ee18fa055a92a5..74edaa9ecee72111b70f32b832486aeebe545a28 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > @@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ int dpu_assign_plane_resources(struct dpu_global_state *global_state,
> >  			       unsigned int num_planes)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int i;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> 
> Thanks, but I think it better to make the function return ret from
> within the loop and return explicit 0 if there was no error.
Will do, v2 incoming...


> 
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < num_planes; i++) {
> >  		struct drm_plane_state *plane_state = states[i];
> > 
> > ---
> > base-commit: a64dcfb451e254085a7daee5fe51bf22959d52d3
> > change-id: 20250209-dpu-c3fac78fc617
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > -- 
> > Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@...ancedwards.com>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ