[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db722f47-0b61-4905-a4a8-c0770fbf8945@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 01:51:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: John J Coleman <jjcolemanx86@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>,
Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ethtool: check device is present when getting ioctl
settings
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 05:31:56PM -0700, John J Coleman wrote:
> An ioctl caller of SIOCETHTOOL ETHTOOL_GSET can provoke the legacy
> ethtool codepath on a non-present device, leading to kernel panic:
>
> [exception RIP: qed_get_current_link+0x11]
> #8 [ffffa2021d70f948] qede_get_link_ksettings at ffffffffc07bfa9a [qede]
> #9 [ffffa2021d70f9d0] __rh_call_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff9bad2723
> #10 [ffffa2021d70fa30] ethtool_get_settings at ffffffff9bad29d0
> #11 [ffffa2021d70fb18] __dev_ethtool at ffffffff9bad442b
> #12 [ffffa2021d70fc28] dev_ethtool at ffffffff9bad6db8
> #13 [ffffa2021d70fc60] dev_ioctl at ffffffff9ba7a55c
> #14 [ffffa2021d70fc98] sock_do_ioctl at ffffffff9ba22a44
> #15 [ffffa2021d70fd08] sock_ioctl at ffffffff9ba22d1c
> #16 [ffffa2021d70fd78] do_vfs_ioctl at ffffffff9b584cf4
>
> Device is not present with no state bits set:
>
> crash> net_device.state ffff8fff95240000
> state = 0x0,
>
> Existing patch commit a699781c79ec ("ethtool: check device is present
> when getting link settings") fixes this in the modern sysfs reader's
> ksettings path.
>
> Fix this in the legacy ioctl path by checking for device presence as
> well.
What is not clear to my is why ethtool_get_settings() is special. Why
does ethtool_set_settings() not suffer from the same problem, or any
of the other ioctls?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists