linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250210145348.59791103@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:53:48 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing
 List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree

Hi Paul,

On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:44:42 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 8:18 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the security tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:62,
> >                  from arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:21:
> > include/linux/security.h:2379:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'security_uring_allowed' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >  2379 | extern int security_uring_allowed(void)
> >       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
> 
> Thanks Stephen, I just pushed a fix to the LSM tree, it should be
> fixed on your next pull.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20250210034132.8448-2-paul@paul-moore.com/

Shouldn't it be "static inline" instead of "extern inline"?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped