[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210142508.vmMQUDkJ@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:25:08 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] sched: Add a generic function to return the
preemption string.
On 2025-02-10 19:51:33 [+0530], Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> No No. That's not what i meant.
>
> I was saying, as peter mentioned in the previous discussion, can we put
> something like below in changelog/comment for a easier understanding.?
Ah. Okay, sure. I didn't realize anyone was asking but for this.
> "
> RT+DYN: PREEMPT_{RT,(dyn_mode)}
> RT+LAZY: PREEMPT_{RT,LAZY}
> RT+FULL: PREEMPT_RT
>
> DYN: PREEMPT_(dyn_mode)
> FULL: PREEMPT
> LAZY: PREEMPTLAZY
> VOLUNTARY: VOLUNTARY
> NONE: NONE
> "
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists