linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: serial: Document sci bindings for the Renesas RZ/T2H (a.k.a r9a09g077) SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <TY3PR01MB113461CABD5E18F03B7BE9B8486F22@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:42:05 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: serial: Document sci bindings for the
 Renesas RZ/T2H (a.k.a r9a09g077) SoC

Hi Geert,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Sent: 10 February 2025 14:35
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: serial: Document sci bindings for the Renesas RZ/T2H (a.k.a
> r9a09g077) SoC
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 15:26, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > Sent: 10 February 2025 14:15
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: serial: Document sci
> > > bindings for the Renesas RZ/T2H (a.k.a
> > > r9a09g077) SoC
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:19, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > > > Sent: 10 February 2025 13:15
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] dt-bindings: serial: Document sci
> > > > > bindings for the Renesas RZ/T2H (a.k.a
> > > > > r9a09g077) SoC
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 17:52, Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Document RZ/T2H (a.k.a r9a09g077) in SCI binding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel
> > > > > > <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your patch!
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,rzsci.y
> > > > > > +++ aml
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
> > > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > > > +%YAML
> > > > > > +1.2
> > > > > > +---
> > > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/renesas,rzsci.yaml#
> > > > >
> > > > > "rzsci" is IMHO a bad name, as SCI on RZ/T2 differs from the
> > > > > similar-named "SCI" (sometimes called "RSCI" or "SCIg") on
> > > > > RZ/A1H, RZ/A2M, RZ/G2L, RZ/V2L, and
> > > RZ/G3S (and most old SuperH SoCs).
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, I believe the variant on RZ/T2 is also used on RZ/N2, RZ/V2H, and RZ/G3E?
> > > > >
> > > > > However, binding-wise, they all seem to be very similar.
> > > > > So perhaps you can just add this to the existing
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,sci.yaml?
> > > >
> > > > It is present in RZ/G3E as well.
> > > > RSCI supports sci, scif, i2c and spi that is the reason renesas,rzsci.yaml introduced.
> > >
> > > If you plan to add support for I2C and SPI, you will need different
> > > bindings under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{i2c,spi}/.
> >
> > OK, I thought since it is a single IP, we need to use a single
> > compatible and instantiate appropriate device based on the device property rather than separate SCI,
> i2c and spi compatible.
> >
> > Yes, I agree having different device compatible for same IP make life
> > easier, no need to add specific vendor property.
> 
> I said "different bindings", not "different compatible values"!
> 
> Cfr. "renesas,tpu" having bindings in both Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,tpu.yaml
> and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/renesas,tpu-pwm.yaml.

Thanks for clarification. This is simple solution.

Cheers,
Biju