[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-12-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:09:46 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] gpio: latch: use value returning setters
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
struct gpio_chip now has additional variants of the set(_multiple)
driver callbacks that return an integer to indicate success or failure.
Convert the driver to using them.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c
index d5d3817eea67..184b7dd17425 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c
@@ -72,41 +72,46 @@ static int gpio_latch_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
}
-static void gpio_latch_set_unlocked(struct gpio_latch_priv *priv,
- int (*set)(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value),
- unsigned int offset, bool val)
+static int gpio_latch_set_unlocked(struct gpio_latch_priv *priv,
+ int (*set)(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value),
+ unsigned int offset, bool val)
{
- int latch = offset / priv->n_latched_gpios;
- int i;
+ int latch = offset / priv->n_latched_gpios, i, ret;
assign_bit(offset, priv->shadow, val);
- for (i = 0; i < priv->n_latched_gpios; i++)
- set(priv->latched_gpios->desc[i],
- test_bit(latch * priv->n_latched_gpios + i, priv->shadow));
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->n_latched_gpios; i++) {
+ ret = set(priv->latched_gpios->desc[i],
+ test_bit(latch * priv->n_latched_gpios + i,
+ priv->shadow));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
ndelay(priv->setup_duration_ns);
set(priv->clk_gpios->desc[latch], 1);
ndelay(priv->clock_duration_ns);
set(priv->clk_gpios->desc[latch], 0);
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void gpio_latch_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int val)
+static int gpio_latch_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int val)
{
struct gpio_latch_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&priv->spinlock);
- gpio_latch_set_unlocked(priv, gpiod_set_value, offset, val);
+ return gpio_latch_set_unlocked(priv, gpiod_set_value, offset, val);
}
-static void gpio_latch_set_can_sleep(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int val)
+static int gpio_latch_set_can_sleep(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int val)
{
struct gpio_latch_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
guard(mutex)(&priv->mutex);
- gpio_latch_set_unlocked(priv, gpiod_set_value_cansleep, offset, val);
+ return gpio_latch_set_unlocked(priv, gpiod_set_value_cansleep, offset, val);
}
static bool gpio_latch_can_sleep(struct gpio_latch_priv *priv, unsigned int n_latches)
@@ -160,11 +165,11 @@ static int gpio_latch_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (gpio_latch_can_sleep(priv, n_latches)) {
priv->gc.can_sleep = true;
- priv->gc.set = gpio_latch_set_can_sleep;
+ priv->gc.set_rv = gpio_latch_set_can_sleep;
mutex_init(&priv->mutex);
} else {
priv->gc.can_sleep = false;
- priv->gc.set = gpio_latch_set;
+ priv->gc.set_rv = gpio_latch_set;
spin_lock_init(&priv->spinlock);
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists