linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add missing registrations of SF8MMx hwcaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bec2a37a-1797-41d2-a44a-a34a54a96f89@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:58:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add missing registrations of SF8MMx hwcaps

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:37:44AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 07:14:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:41:09PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

> > > Looking again, it looks like KERNEL_HWCAP_FPRCVT also isn't wired up?

> > Indeed.  I'll add that separately.

> Given that KERNEL_HWCAP_FPRCVT was also added by commit 819935464cb2,
> I assume you mean you'll send a v2 of this patch doing that.

Well, I was actually intending to send a separate patch given that
otherwise it ends up looking like two different changelogs in the same
patch and the diffs shouldn't overlap.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)